mondohas.blogg.se - Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore zip file
#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore archive
#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore full
#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore software
#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore plus

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore full

GUI UTF-8 support for full internationalization of the application was completed in release 2.2.0.

^ UTF-8 file/path-names support was completed in release 3.0.1 on Unix systems, and in release 5.8.0 on Windows systems.

^ Commandline batch compression is available only for ZIP and ALZ formats.

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore archive

Full support for Unicode files names by default is supported only for 7-Zip and RAR archive formats.

^ Does support Unicode names, but not under the default (initial) option settings: the user must tick 'Use OEM conversion for filenames' under 'General' on the 'Miscellaneous' tab in the Configuration dialog to enable Unicode name support.

There will be no problem extracting them, however.

^ In WinRAR 3.60, when opening 7-Zip archives which contains Unicode file/directory names, they will not be displayed correctly.

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore zip file

More recent versions of the zip file format have support for Unicode filenames.

^ Extracting/adding file and/or directory names into archive in either UTF-7, UTF-8 or UTF-16/UCS-2 encoding to support single file/directory name which contains characters from different languages.

^ Allows adding a variable amount of redundancy for much better error recovery.

^GNU tar calls the external programs gzip and bzip2 to perform compression these external programs usually come with systems that contain GNU tar.

^ Application is only for decompression.

Information about what common archiver features are implemented natively (without third-party add-ons). X86, Command-line interface expander only This is presumably a 'compatibility layer.' Linux Ubuntu's own GUI Archive manager, for example, can open and create many archive formats (including Rar archives) even to the extent of splitting into parts and encryption and ability to be read by the native program.

The operating systems the archivers can run on without emulation or compatibility layer.

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore plus

An added bonus to that is that you may use PAR tools to create recovery files.įor extraction, you could pick any of the programs with the exception of WinZip as it performed poorly in the second extraction test.Included in Microsoft WindowsWindows Explorer shell since Windows Me.įree expander $49.99 Deluxe, $79.99 French Deluxe Windows: $14.99 Standard, $29.99 Deluxe, $49.99 French (or German) Deluxe įree expander (GNU/Linux & Mac only) $29.00 Standard $39.00 Plus WinRAR may be an option if you don't mind creation RAR archives. If it is compression size you are after, you might want to test 7-Zip or PeaZip instead. compression options, format support, or business support, may play a role as well.Īs far as recommendations go: if you compress a lot of files, you may want to check out Bandizip as it performed really well. The two factors are important but others, e.g. Speed and size are just two factors that play a role when it comes to compression software. WinRAR did perform better than WinZip in all tests despite ZIP being WinZIPs main format. The free archivers performed well during tests and at least one of them managed to beat the commercial programs in all tests. WinZip came in last with a running time of 480 seconds. Bandizip, which performed really well in the other tests required 117 seconds to extract the archives. PeaZip was the fastest with 69 seconds followed by 7-Zip which just needed a second more. The situation changed significantly when it came to the second extraction test.

Third-placed WinRAR needed 13 seconds for the task. Second placed were 7-Zip, PeaZip, and WinZIP which all needed 12 seconds. Second-placed in this test was WinRAR which required roughly two times the time of Bandizip.Įxtraction was closer together: Bandizip performed best in the first task as it needed only 8 seconds to extract the first archive.

#Hamster free zip archiver 3 years agomore software

The software performed badly when settings were set to maximum compression though as it needed roughly 10 times the time Bandizip required. 7-Zip did well in the default compression test as it was just 2 seconds slower than first-placed Bandizip. For the first file, it took only 5 seconds and 11 seconds to compress it whereas the second fastest, WinRAR, took 13 seconds and 23 seconds to perform the same operation.īandizip was fastest for the second task as well as it took the software 45 and 46 seconds to compress the Gigabyte-sized archive in normal and best compression settings. Bandizip performed well in all compression tasks it came first in all tests and often by a huge margin. Extraction Test #2: 10 ZIP archives with a size between 13 Megabytes and 1.36 Gigabytes, and a total size of 4.09 Gigabytes and over 20000 files.Extraction Test #1: A ZIP archive with a size of 1.36 Gigabytes.File types include documents, images, video files, and other file types. Compression Test #2: 180 files with a size of 3.46 Gigabytes.Compression Test #1: Folder with 11 subfolders and 100 files, and a total size of 949 Megabytes.